1. 10 May, 2016 5 commits
  2. 09 May, 2016 7 commits
    • Luca Boccassi's avatar
      Merge pull request #1974 from hitstergtd/master · a6e8d153
      Luca Boccassi authored
      Problem: style/typo issue
      a6e8d153
    • hitstergtd's avatar
      Problem: style/typo issue · 8fc985a9
      hitstergtd authored
      Solution:
      Fix it.
      8fc985a9
    • Luca Boccassi's avatar
      Merge pull request #1973 from hitstergtd/x-fix-m4-llvm-gcov-coverage · a4a247cf
      Luca Boccassi authored
      Problem: Coverage option broken with LLVM GCOV Frontend
      a4a247cf
    • Constantin Rack's avatar
      Merge pull request #1972 from hitstergtd/x-stylefix-udpengine · 3eef0a7b
      Constantin Rack authored
      Problem: UDP engine code not indented properly [style]
      3eef0a7b
    • hitstergtd's avatar
      Problem: Coverage option broken with LLVM GCOV · 415af273
      hitstergtd authored
      Solution:
      This is an issue with the imported Autoconf M4 macro package for standardised
      code coverage builds, i.e. using --enable-code-coverage.
      
      The simplest way that I could find is to add a case statement that checks if
      the output of running `gcov -version` contains the "LLVM" keyword; if that is
      true then do not link with LIBGCOV as its neither required nor supported when
      using the GCOV frontend for LLVM; least not on Mac OS X. The case statement
      would also be the most portable.
      
      Moreover, using the "-version" argument instead of "-v" seems to be the best
      bet as that is supported by the normal GCOV and LLVM GCOV frontend.
      
      Upstream candidate - this solution should be improved by Autoconf M4 macro
      overlords and applied to the upstream M4 package; I could not find a suitable
      way to detect if LLVM GCOV is being used, except for the solution herein; this
      should also work on *BSD too.
      415af273
    • Luca Boccassi's avatar
      Merge pull request #1971 from sappo/master · 1f309d3a
      Luca Boccassi authored
      Problem: Deploying release artifacts to github is a manual process
      1f309d3a
    • Kevin Sapper's avatar
      Problem: Deploying release artifacts is a manual process · b2255811
      Kevin Sapper authored
      Solution: Use travis to deploy these artifacts automatically.
      
      The deployment is triggered by tagging on the zeromq/libzmq repository.
      Of the many builds travis is checking only the default one with
      libsodium and drafts disabled is used for deployment.
      
      For now the results of `make distcheck` are deployed as well as their
      md5 and sha1 hash sums. Further changes may upload a generated
      Changelog as well.
      b2255811
  3. 08 May, 2016 5 commits
  4. 06 May, 2016 5 commits
  5. 05 May, 2016 7 commits
  6. 04 May, 2016 11 commits