1. 20 Sep, 2016 2 commits
  2. 17 Sep, 2016 9 commits
  3. 14 Sep, 2016 2 commits
  4. 12 Sep, 2016 2 commits
  5. 04 Sep, 2016 4 commits
  6. 01 Sep, 2016 2 commits
  7. 28 Aug, 2016 6 commits
  8. 27 Aug, 2016 4 commits
  9. 24 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  10. 23 Aug, 2016 4 commits
  11. 16 Aug, 2016 2 commits
  12. 13 Aug, 2016 2 commits
    • Luca Boccassi's avatar
      Merge pull request #2082 from pijyoi/fix_zmqstream_doc · 8d00cdd9
      Luca Boccassi authored
      Problem: zmq_stream doc is confusing regarding ZMQ_SNDMORE flag
      8d00cdd9
    • KIU Shueng Chuan's avatar
      Problem: zmq_stream doc is confusing regarding ZMQ_SNDMORE flag · 53402156
      KIU Shueng Chuan authored
      Solution: fix it.
      
      The documentation first states that the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag is ignored on
      data frames. Then it states that omitting the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag has
      consequences. The example HTTP server code further muddies the situation
      with a similar comment.
      
      The implementation of ZMQ_STREAM only accepts two-part messages.
      The first part is an identity frame while the second and last part is
      the data frame.
      
      As with any multipart message, all parts except the last need the
      ZMQ_SNDMORE flag. The second and last part would normally omit the
      ZMQ_SNDMORE flag to mark the end of the multipart message.
      
      However, the ZMQ_STREAM implementation ignores the ZMQ_SNDMORE flag on
      the data frame rather than requiring that it be omitted. The latter
      behaviour would have been more consistent with the other ZeroMQ
      sockets.
      53402156