Commit c641644b authored by Simon Giesecke's avatar Simon Giesecke

Problem: inconsistent parameter names

Solution: harmonize
parent ce4b71c3
......@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ void zmq::socket_base_t::extract_flags (msg_t *msg_)
_rcvmore = (msg_->flags () & msg_t::more) != 0;
}
int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *endpoint_, int events_)
{
scoped_lock_t lock (_monitor_sync);
......@@ -1587,14 +1587,14 @@ int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
}
// Support deregistering monitoring endpoints as well
if (addr_ == NULL) {
if (endpoint_ == NULL) {
stop_monitor ();
return 0;
}
// Parse addr_ string.
std::string protocol;
std::string address;
if (parse_uri (addr_, protocol, address) || check_protocol (protocol))
if (parse_uri (endpoint_, protocol, address) || check_protocol (protocol))
return -1;
// Event notification only supported over inproc://
......@@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ int zmq::socket_base_t::monitor (const char *addr_, int events_)
stop_monitor (false);
// Spawn the monitor socket endpoint
rc = zmq_bind (_monitor_socket, addr_);
rc = zmq_bind (_monitor_socket, endpoint_);
if (rc == -1)
stop_monitor (false);
return rc;
......@@ -1809,34 +1809,35 @@ std::string zmq::routing_socket_base_t::extract_connect_routing_id ()
return res;
}
void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id, pipe_t *pipe_)
void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id_,
pipe_t *pipe_)
{
// Add the record into output pipes lookup table
const out_pipe_t outpipe = {pipe_, true};
const bool ok =
_out_pipes.ZMQ_MAP_INSERT_OR_EMPLACE (ZMQ_MOVE (routing_id), outpipe)
_out_pipes.ZMQ_MAP_INSERT_OR_EMPLACE (ZMQ_MOVE (routing_id_), outpipe)
.second;
zmq_assert (ok);
}
bool zmq::routing_socket_base_t::has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const
bool zmq::routing_socket_base_t::has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const
{
return 0 != _out_pipes.count (routing_id);
return 0 != _out_pipes.count (routing_id_);
}
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t *
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id)
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_)
{
// TODO we could probably avoid constructor a temporary blob_t to call this function
out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
return it == _out_pipes.end () ? NULL : &it->second;
}
const zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t *
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const
{
// TODO we could probably avoid constructor a temporary blob_t to call this function
out_pipes_t::const_iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
out_pipes_t::const_iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
return it == _out_pipes.end () ? NULL : &it->second;
}
......@@ -1847,9 +1848,9 @@ void zmq::routing_socket_base_t::erase_out_pipe (pipe_t *pipe_)
}
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::out_pipe_t
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id)
zmq::routing_socket_base_t::try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_)
{
const out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id);
const out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.find (routing_id_);
out_pipe_t res = {NULL, false};
if (it != _out_pipes.end ()) {
res = it->second;
......
......@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ class socket_base_t : public own_t,
// Query the state of a specific peer. The default implementation
// always returns an ENOTSUP error.
virtual int get_peer_state (const void *identity_,
size_t identity_size_) const;
virtual int get_peer_state (const void *routing_id_,
size_t routing_id_size_) const;
protected:
socket_base_t (zmq::ctx_t *parent_,
......@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ class socket_base_t : public own_t,
private:
// test if event should be sent and then dispatch it
void event (const std::string &addr_, intptr_t fd_, int type_);
void event (const std::string &addr_, intptr_t value_, int type_);
// Socket event data dispatch
void monitor_event (int event_, intptr_t value_, const std::string &addr_);
......@@ -318,18 +318,18 @@ class routing_socket_base_t : public socket_base_t
bool active;
};
void add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id, pipe_t *pipe_);
bool has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const;
out_pipe_t *lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id);
const out_pipe_t *lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id) const;
void add_out_pipe (blob_t routing_id_, pipe_t *pipe_);
bool has_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const;
out_pipe_t *lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_);
const out_pipe_t *lookup_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_) const;
void erase_out_pipe (pipe_t *pipe_);
out_pipe_t try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id);
template <typename Func> bool any_of_out_pipes (Func func)
out_pipe_t try_erase_out_pipe (const blob_t &routing_id_);
template <typename Func> bool any_of_out_pipes (Func func_)
{
bool res = false;
for (out_pipes_t::iterator it = _out_pipes.begin ();
it != _out_pipes.end () && !res; ++it) {
res |= func (*it->second.pipe);
res |= func_ (*it->second.pipe);
}
return res;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment