That is to say, whereas previously we would extend capnp::typeId<T>() to a new type by declaring a specialization of it for that type, now we instead have the type contain a nested class called _capnpPrivate which contains a `typeId` constant.

This is necessary because it is impossible to specialize a template for a type which is itself nested inside a template type. E.g. it's impossible to write a specialization `template <typename T> typeId<Foo<T>::Bar>()`; C++ simply doesn't support this. But with generics, Cap'n Proto will allow types to be nested inside templates, so we need this to work.