Commit b970cb4a authored by Kenton Varda's avatar Kenton Varda

Update test configs

parent 9ecd8c51
linux-gcc-4.7 1900 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.7 quick
linux-gcc-4.8 1903 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.8 quick gcc-4.8
linux-clang 1935 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-clang quick clang
linux-gcc-4.7 930 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.7 quick gcc-4.7
linux-gcc-4.8 929 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.8 quick gcc-4.8
linux-clang 959 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-clang quick clang
mac 884 ./super-test.sh remote beat caffeinate quick
cygwin 809 ./super-test.sh remote Kenton@flashman quick
cygwin 923 ./super-test.sh remote Kenton@flashman quick
linux-gcc-4.7 14779 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.7
linux-gcc-4.8 13122 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.8 gcc-4.8
linux-clang 14907 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-clang clang
mac 5741 ./super-test.sh remote beat caffeinate
cygwin 6764 ./super-test.sh remote Kenton@flashman
linux-gcc-4.7 5952 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.7 gcc-4.7
linux-gcc-4.8 5246 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-gcc-4.8 gcc-4.8
linux-clang 6039 ./super-test.sh tmpdir capnp-clang clang
mac 5758 ./super-test.sh remote beat caffeinate
cygwin 6770 ./super-test.sh remote Kenton@flashman
......@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
gcc-4.8 )
export CXX=g++-4.8
;;
gcc-4.7 )
export CXX=g++-4.7
;;
kenton )
cat << "__EOF__"
=========================================================================
......@@ -222,14 +225,12 @@ if [ $IS_CLANG = yes ]; then
# There's an unused private field in gtest.
export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wno-unused-private-field"
else
if (${CXX:-g++} --version | grep -q ' 4[.]8'); then
# GCC 4.8 emits a weird uninitialized warning in kj/parse/char-test, deep in one of the parser
# combinators. It could be a real bug but there is just not enough information to figure out
# where the problem is coming from, because GCC does not provide any description of the inlining
# that has occurred. Since I have not observed any actual problem (tests pass, etc.), I'm
# muting it for now.
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wno-maybe-uninitialized"
fi
# GCC 4.8 emits a weird uninitialized warning in kj/parse/char-test, deep in one of the parser
# combinators. It could be a real bug but there is just not enough information to figure out
# where the problem is coming from, because GCC does not provide any description of the inlining
# that has occurred. Since I have not observed any actual problem (tests pass, etc.), I'm
# muting it for now.
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -Wno-maybe-uninitialized"
fi
cd c++
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment