Commit 9dc1cfa3 authored by Kenton Varda's avatar Kenton Varda

Merge pull request #156 from dwrensha/typo

fix some typos
parents 7dd63203 dbc64250
...@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ struct WireHelpers { ...@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ struct WireHelpers {
} }
// We must verify that the pointer has the right size. Unlike in // We must verify that the pointer has the right size. Unlike in
// getWritableStructListReference(), we never need to "upgrade" the data, because this // getWritableStructListPointer(), we never need to "upgrade" the data, because this
// method is called only for non-struct lists, and there is no allowed upgrade path *to* // method is called only for non-struct lists, and there is no allowed upgrade path *to*
// a non-struct list, only *from* them. // a non-struct list, only *from* them.
......
...@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ struct Exception { ...@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ struct Exception {
# - Bugs. # - Bugs.
# - Invalid input. # - Invalid input.
# - Configuration errors. # - Configuration errors.
# - Network probles. # - Network problems.
# - Insufficient resources. # - Insufficient resources.
# - Version skew (unimplemented functionality). # - Version skew (unimplemented functionality).
# - Other logistical problems. # - Other logistical problems.
......
...@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct Node { ...@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct Node {
struct NestedNode { struct NestedNode {
name @0 :Text; name @0 :Text;
# Unqualified symbol name. Unlike Node.name, this *can* be used programmatically. # Unqualified symbol name. Unlike Node.displayName, this *can* be used programmatically.
# #
# (On Zooko's triangle, this is the node's petname according to its parent scope.) # (On Zooko's triangle, this is the node's petname according to its parent scope.)
...@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ struct Brand { ...@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ struct Brand {
# List of parameter bindings. # List of parameter bindings.
inherit @2 :Void; inherit @2 :Void;
# The place where this TypeEnivornment appears is actually within this scope or a sub-scope, # The place where this Brand appears is actually within this scope or a sub-scope,
# and the bindings for this scope should be inherited from the reference point. # and the bindings for this scope should be inherited from the reference point.
} }
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment