Commit 60e1a79d authored by Kenton Varda's avatar Kenton Varda

typos

parent 48df7686
......@@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ Notes:
you do not want any field set by default, simply declare a field called "unset" and make it the
lowest-numbered field.
* You can move an exsiting field into a new union without breaking compatibility with existing
* You can move an existing field into a new union without breaking compatibility with existing
data, as long as all of the other fields in the union are new. Since the existing field is
necessarily the lowest-numebered in the union, it will be the union's default field.
necessarily the lowest-numbered in the union, it will be the union's default field.
**Wait, why aren't unions first-class types?**
......@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ struct Person {
{% endhighlight %}
Interface-wise, the above group behaves as if you had defined a nested struct called `Address` and
then a field `address :Address`. However, a gorup is _not_ a separate object from its containing
then a field `address :Address`. However, a group is _not_ a separate object from its containing
struct: the fields are numbered in the same space as the containing struct's fields, and are laid
out exactly the same as if they hadn't been grouped at all. Essentially, a group is just a
namespace.
......
......@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ a 1.0 release would happen nor how many 0.x release might precede it.
These are features we'd like to implement some day but haven't decided yet how to prioritize.
Some of these features could make their way into Cap'n Proto before version 1.0. Others will
certainly come after. If you have opnions on what you'd like to see next,
certainly come after. If you have opinions on what you'd like to see next,
[tell us](https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto)!
### Language Features
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment