@@ -2,8 +2,7 @@ file:74:30-32: error: As of Cap'n Proto v0.3, it is no longer necessary to assig
file:74:30-32: error: As of Cap'n Proto v0.3, the 'union' keyword should be prefixed with a colon for named unions, e.g. `foo :union {`.
file:79:23-25: error: As of Cap'n Proto v0.3, it is no longer necessary to assign numbers to unions. However, removing the number will break binary compatibility. If this is an old protocol and you need to retain compatibility, please add an exclamation point after the number to indicate that it is really needed, e.g. `foo @1! :union {`. If this is a new protocol or compatibility doesn't matter, just remove the @n entirely. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for being an early adopter! :)
file:84:17-19: error: As of Cap'n Proto v0.3, the 'union' keyword should be prefixed with a colon for named unions, e.g. `foo :union {`.
file:121:38-41: error: Missing field name.
file:132:7-10: error: 'using' declaration without '=' must use a qualified path.
file:132:7-10: error: 'using' declaration without '=' must specify a named declaration from a different scope.
file:37:3-10: error: 'dupName' is already defined in this scope.
file:36:3-10: error: 'dupName' previously defined here.
file:52:5-12: error: 'dupName' is already defined in this scope.
...
...
@@ -24,12 +23,13 @@ file:41:18-19: error: Skipped ordinal @3. Ordinals must be sequential with no h
file:69:15-17: error: Union ordinal, if specified, must be greater than no more than one of its member ordinals (i.e. there can only be one field retroactively unionized).